Analytic Network Process (ANP)

Tools & Methods

Nov 30, 2025
photo

Analytic Network model describing the linkages and feedbacks of the criteria and indicator sets and management strategies (Wolfslehner et al. 2005)

The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method that extends the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) by allowing for feedback and dependencies between decision elements, creating a network rather than a strict hierarchy. Developed by Thomas Saaty, it's used for complex problems where criteria can influence each other, unlike AHP which assumes independence. The process involves modeling the problem as a network, performing pairwise comparisons, forming a supermatrix, and synthesizing results to find the best alternatives.

The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is used in forest restoration to evaluate and prioritize management strategies by modelling the complex interdependencies between various factors like environmental, social, and economic criteria. By using a network structure, ANP can more accurately represent the relationships and feedback loops that are missed in simpler hierarchical methods, such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), allowing for a more systemic and comprehensive analysis of forest management and restoration decisions.

The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method developed by Thomas L. Saaty. It is a generalization of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) that allows for the modelling of complex decision problems involving interdependencies and feedback between decision elements. Unlike AHP, which structures a problem linearly as a hierarchy (Goal à Criteria à Alternatives) and assumes independence between elements, ANP uses a network structure to capture real-world complexities.

The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is a highly suitable and commonly used tool in forest restoration and sustainable forest management. It is frequently employed because restoration projects are complex, involving numerous, often-conflicting criteria that are interdependent, which is exactly the type of problem ANP is designed to model.

A paper by Wolfslehner et al. (2005) discusses the differences in evaluation results between AHP and ANP, as well as strengths and weaknesses of both approaches for SFM. Mohammadi and Mohammadi (2008) used AHP and ANP to compare different strategic management options in the Shafarood forest in north of Iran.

Kind of License: Not stated/unknown

Access full content
Source/Author(s)
  • Michael den Herder
Topic
  • Active Restoration
  • Economic & Financial
  • Implementation
Stakeholders
  • Planners & Implementers
Purpose
  • Afforestation, reforestation
  • Climate change mitigation
  • Connectivity and landscape diversity
  • Show 4 more
Spatial scale
  • None/Non-relevant