Prescribed burn in Dow Field, Nichols Arboretum, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Training exercise for students in an ecological restoration course at the University of Michigan. Photo: Bob Grese
This EPA publication focuses on the Agency’s efforts to address environmental degradation and promote restoration of ecosystems across the United States. It reviews programs and policies aimed at cleaning up contaminated sites, restoring air and water quality, rehabilitating damaged lands and supporting healthier communities. By combining regulatory actions with collaborative initiatives, the document illustrates how restoration contributes not only to ecological health but also to public safety, economic vitality, and long-term resilience.
This guidance is intended to assist managers of ecological restoration projects with developing and implementing effective quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) strategies. If designed and implemented properly, such QA/QC approaches will improve the quality of data collected, increase the certainty of project decision making, and ultimately save time and money. Although many resources are available to assist project managers with quality systems, this guidance focuses specifically on applying QA/QC concepts to monitoring the effectiveness of ecological restoration projects, with the recognition that these projects have unique QA/QC challenges. Anticipated additional users of this guidance include ecological restoration specialists and stakeholders representing federal and state agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), civic and local groups, and the academic community. Guidance is provided on QA/QC considerations throughout project planning and preparation, as well as data collection, review and evaluation. Details, instructions, resources and examples are provided within each of the individual chapters. Because every restoration project is unique and requirements vary widely among organizations, the information is provided in a guidance document rather than an instruction manual. Notably, we have included information about the philosophy behind the recommended QA/QC strategies so that users can adapt the recommendations to the particular needs of their project and funding organization.